Thursday 24 may 2012 4 24 /05 /May /2012 10:46

Asus probably isn't the first company that comes to mind when you think of big desktop replacement laptops that are optimized for gaming. The Asus G75VW, however, is the latest in a long line of gaming laptops produced by the company under the "Republic of Gamers" brand. Considering that gaming laptops often go for well over $2000, this big machine is relatively budget-priced, and it isn't awful--but it isn't great, either. Although it suffers in general performance, audio quality, and battery life, it has a nice screen, and the price may be right.

 

asus_g75v

 

Our review model, priced at $1500 (as of May 23, 2012), sports an Intel Core i7-3610QM processor, 12GB of RAM, 1.5TB of hard-drive space, and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M graphics chip. It also has built-in 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, and a Blu-ray/DVD combo drive. The G75VW runs the 64-bit version of Windows 7 Home Premium.

 

Performance


In our WorldBench 7 benchmark tests, the G75VW posted a paltry score of 97. This means that the G75VW is 3 percent slower than our baseline system, which is not an impressive achievement for a desktop replacement laptop. After all, our baseline system is a desktop PC with an Intel Core i5-2500K processor, 8GB of RAM, and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti graphics card. A WorldBench 7 score of 97 is far from outstanding for an all-purpose laptop, let alone a desktop replacement specifically designed for gamers.

Asus G75VW desktop replacement laptop test results

The G75VW's performance in our graphics and gaming tests was a little better than its WorldBench 7 showing, and much closer to what we expect from the desktop replacement category. In our Crysis 2 graphics tests, the G75VW managed a frame rate of 30.8 frames per second (high quality settings, 1980 by 1080 resolution), which isn't terrible. For context, on the same graphics test the Origin EON17-S produced a frame rate of 43.1 fps, while the MSI GT70 managed a frame rate of 33.8 fps.

Asus G75VW desktop replacement laptop test results

Like most huge desktop replacements geared toward gamers, the G75VW doesn't boast impressive battery life. In our tests it lasted for 2 hours, 35 minutes, coming within 3 minutes of the Origin EON17-S, currently the highest-rated product in this category.

 

Design: Chassis, Keyboard, and Touchpad


There are few ways to make a hulking, 9.5-pound desktop replacement attractive, but Asus does a decent job of it by giving the G75VW a wedge-shaped chassis with slick angles and a soft, rubberized plastic black cover. The G75VW looks a lot like its predecessor, the G74SX, but it's a tad lighter (9.5 instead of 9.9 pounds) and a bit thinner (2.04 inches at its thickest, versus 2.4 inches). It still comes with a hefty 2-pound power brick, however.

The interior is also attractive, with a brushed-metal keyboard deck, a rubberized wrist-rest area, and a silvery Republic of Gamers logo. A few pinprick-size white and green LEDs on the bottom-left corner of the computer indicate battery status, Wi-Fi, eco-mode, and the like. The LEDs are bright, but not distractingly so.

As for ports, the G75VW is fairly packed, with four USB 3.0 ports (including one sleep-and-charge), ethernet, headphone and microphone jacks, and a three-in-one card reader. You also get HDMI-out, VGA-out, and a mini-DisplayPort connection.

The G75VW sports a full-size backlit keyboard with matte-black island-style keys. In addition, the keyboard deck is large enough to fit a 10-key number pad, which is located about an inch and a half to the right of the keyboard (some computers cram the keyboard and number pad right next to each other, which is inconvenient for users--especially gamers). The G75VW's keys are widely spaced and easy to press, and offer good feedback.

The large, soft plastic black touchpad has two big, discrete mouse buttons. The touchpad supports multitouch gestures such as pinch-to-zoom, and the buttons are easy to press. Regrettably, the touchpad isn't as responsive as I like to see in gaming laptops, and the cursor seems to drag slowly across the screen. Fortunately, you don't have to use the touchpad: Asus includes a USB-wired gaming mouse that has five buttons and a scrollwheel. Since gamers will probably prefer to use an external mouse with this computer regardless, the sluggish touchpad isn't a deal breaker.

 

Screen and Speakers


The G75VW has a 17.3-inch LED-backlit matte screen with a native resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels. This screen is an improvement over the glossy display of the Asus G74SX (and that screen was actually very good, save for some backlighting glitches). The G75VW's screen is bright and offers an excellent range of off-axis viewing angles. Colors look great, and images and text appear crisp. Media playback--both streaming HD footage and Blu-ray video--looks fantastic, with sharp images and deep blacks.

The laptop has two speakers and a subwoofer, located above the keyboard and placed under a gray metal mesh. The speakers are loud enough, but the default setting has the subwoofer delivering not only the bass, but all of the other sounds as well. The result is a harsh-sounding mess of audio, delivered predominantly from the left side of the machine. You can tweak the sound settings for slightly better results by going to Control Panel > Sound > Speakers > Properties and adjusting the mono-bass from the default setting of 80 down to about 45. This improves the sound quality a little, but audio still tends to have a harsh, raw edge that's painful to listen to. Thankfully, the headphone jack provides clean audio with plenty of depth.

 

The Bottom Line


The Asus G75VW / Asus a32-f3  is a budget-priced gaming laptop, and in this case you kind of get what you pay for. Don't get me wrong: The G75VW can play most games at an acceptable level, and it's a fairly attractive machine to boot. Plus, it has a great screen with excellent viewing angles.

That said, it's lacking in general performance, and it's nothing like some of the higher-end gaming laptops we've seen, such as the Origin EON17-S. On the other hand, though the EON17-S has twice the WorldBench 7 score of the G75VW, it also costs more than twice as much.

If you're looking for a somewhat budget-friendly gaming laptop, the G75VW is quite capable. But you will need to use headphones.

By batteryshops.over-blog.com
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Tuesday 27 march 2012 2 27 /03 /Mar /2012 04:56

Tagcloud: Laptop News  , how to , PC industry killed the ultrabook , ultrabooks , laptop battery , hp 484170-001 battery , toshiba satellite pro a120 battery

 

The personal computer industry backed a promising candidate in the ultrabook concept, convincing even a skeptic like myself that a new class of superslim, superlight laptops was the key to exciting consumers. Ultrabooks were well on their way to becoming the PC form factor of the future.

And now, it's already over.

In record time -- something less than six months -- the ultrabook term has become so overused and amorphous that it's well on its way to being useless.

Liberal terminology

The first major examples of this new ultrabook rift are two laptops we recently reviewed. The HP Envy 14 Spectre and the Samsung Series 5 Ultra are both 14-inch laptops pitched as ultrabooks. The idea of bringing the ultrabook concept to larger laptops is a reasonable one -- the initial wave of ultrabooks were all 13-inch systems -- but they need to be nearly as thin and lightweight as the 13-inch models.

Instead, both the HP Spectre and Samsung Series 5 Ultra weigh a hair under 4 pounds, about a full pound more than a 13-inch MacBook Air. Both are also about one-tenth of an inch thicker. That may not sound like much, but when less than an inch is your baseline, that represents more than a 10 percent increase. It makes a noticeable difference in the feel of the laptop in your hand.

The biggest deviation from the ultrabook model to date is the 14-inch Samsung ultrabook's use of a standard 500GB platter hard drive. The ultrabook platform is supposed to be built around faster, lighter solid-state drives (SSDs), and Samsung includes a tiny 16GB SSD as a secondary drive, which allows it to meet the letter, if not the spirit, of the ultrabook specifications. This system also includes an optical drive, which is another difference from previous ultrabooks.

What you end up with, especially in the case of the Series 5 Ultra, is a perfectly fine midsize, mainstream laptop that can stand toe to toe with anything similar in the $850-$950 range. If we had seen it eight months or a year ago, our initial impression would be, "Wow, that's a pretty thin 14-inch laptop."

But today, there's absolutely nothing about it that says "ultrabook," which is bad news for this promising new category.

The origins of ultrabook

So, what is an ultrabook supposed to be, anyway?

Seeing the success of Apple's MacBook Air, Intel and PC manufacturers wanted to find a way to replicate it for Windows-based consumers in systems that could be sold at a reasonable price. The idea was pitched as an entirely new laptop category, although technically the name "Ultrabook" was a trademarked Intel marketing term, and the systems that were going to use it had to meet a series of Intel-set system requirements.

In fact, Intel even set aside $300 million to help PC makers develop these new systems, saying in August 2011 that it would "invest in companies building hardware and software technologies focused on enhancing how people interact with Ultrabooks such as through sensors and touch, achieving all-day usage through longer battery life, enabling innovative physical designs, and improved storage capacity."

From that original big idea, and the subsequent challenge Intel presented to PC makers, came the first generation of laptops to use the ultrabook name. These systems, from companies such as Acer, Lenovo, Toshiba, and Asus, came off very well in our initial reviews and we were surprisingly impressed with the platform, especially as prices declined, offering buyers systems with 128GB SSD drives for as little as $799.

Ultrabooks 2012: From noteworthy to no big deal

But a few months ago, at CES 2012, I warned that the road ahead looked foggy, saying: "The ultrabook is in danger of being oversold by both Intel and industry watchers overeager to get behind the Next Big Thing."

And that seems to be exactly what is happening here. The ultrabook idea was a hit. It seemed to have high name recognition with CNET readers, who would e-mail us with specific questions about which ultrabook they should buy. Now, with bigger 14- and even 15-inch ultrabooks hitting stores, some of these new systems feel like they dilute the concept far too much.

For an example of this kind of branding done right, think back to the early days of wireless networks, when Intel's Centrino branding meant that a laptop was able to connect to Wi-Fi and do most of the other networking things you needed it to, without you having to delve too deeply into the spec sheet. In this case, instead of looking for an Intel ultrabook sticker on a laptop and knowing it was going to be very thin, very light, rely on SSD storage, boot quickly, and run for a long time on a battery charge, now consumers will have to go back to checking the size and weight specs carefully.

How is that helpful for anybody?

The ultrabook is dead; long live the (much-improved) laptop
But the ultrabook, as originally presented, is still an idea whose time has come. Apple's MacBook Air proved that consumers could live without optical drives and large-capacity hard drives, and valued long battery life and portability over ports and connections (in that sense, systems such as the Dell Adamo were ahead of their time). Ultrabook branding is certainly not going away anytime soon, and we'll all see dozens of new ultrathin laptops both with the ultrabook label and without during the rest of 2012.

The real long-term victory is that the ultrabook is slowly rewriting what it means to be a mainstream laptop. By this time next year, I find it hard to believe that any midprice, midsize laptop won't be well under 1 inch, and closer to 3 pounds than 4 or 5. Optical drives will continue to fade away, as will dedicated Ethernet jacks (although I'm still convinced you'll eventually need one in a pinch). If you're a PC maker and most of your future laptops aren't at least trending toward ultrabooks and the MacBook Air, you simply won't be in the game.

So, yeah: I'm no longer sure what "ultrabook" means anymore. But if most future laptops are going to be thinner, lighter, and faster -- whether or not they get an Intel-approved sticker -- maybe that's not such a bad thing.

 

By batteryshops.over-blog.com
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 21 march 2012 3 21 /03 /Mar /2012 10:02

Intel had great success with its new 'thin and lite' Ultrabooks in 2011, but that was primarily with consumer products which were the first to come to market. The company says that will change in 2012, as commercial-focused Ultrabooks will hit the market by the second half of the year. And that means a significant opportunity for the channel.

"With Ultrabooks, we've undertaken an effort to revolutionize computers, again," said C.J. Bruno, VP Sales and Marketing Group, President of Intel Americas, to the audience at the Intel Solutions Summit executive keynotes. "We've only just got started, with a host of innovations from a platform perspective. We will redefine what computers are and will scream from the mountaintops that we are doing so."

Kirk Skaugenz, corporate vice president and general manager of the PC Client Group, also stressed this message that what has been seen so far in Ultrabooks is just scratching the surface.

"We are delivering compelling new user experiences rather than just transitioning up," Skaugenz said in his keynote. "This will be a transformational year." Skaugenz promised that with the Ultrabook, Intel would deliver the ultimate in performance in a no-compromise device, in terms of graphics, media and compute performance.

"We will introduce incredible new form factors and shrink them over time," Skaugenz said. "There won't be a need to carry both a tablet and a notebook."

Intel's vPro security technology, embedded hardware technology for malware protection developed by working with McAfee, will also produce "the most secure experience on a device we are aware of," he added.

Skaugenz said that 18 Ultrabooks are presently on the market, which he said would rise to over 75 by the end of the year. But what's more important for the channel is the appearance of models targeted explicitly at the commercial market.

"Until now, Ultrabooks have been focused on consumers, but beginning in the second half of this year we will have ultimate Ultrabooks for business , with the security, manageability and stability of vPro," Skaugenz said. "There will be no more 'business notebook that's thick' vs 'consumer that's thin."

Skaugenz said 2012 will being stunning visuals to the market with the third generation Ivy Bridge chip.

"The third generation chip will have significantly better --- 80% -- graphics, and better security, embedded into the hardware so you don't have to carry around keys, and 80% better media transcode," he said.

Skaugenz said Touch capability, which they have delivered for over 10 years in embedded devices, would also come into the volume mainstream this year with Windows 8.

"We have the ability to put every sensor into an Ultrabook that is available in tablets today," he said.

For the commercial market, which has historically been slightly less receptive to 'wow' factors than the consumer market when extra expense is involved, the question will be if buyers will respond with the same enthusiasm they have on the consumer side, and Intel says every sign they see points to a robust positive response.

"Consumers, whether they are in personal lives or employees of a company dictate to the industry and IT departments what they want -- things like instant responsiveness, long battery life, light and sleek," Bruno said. "That's what consumers want, whether for business or in their personal life."

Bruno said there has been a premium for Ultrabook of $100-150 so far, and we will see that in the commercial segment as well.

"The delta will continue over time, but people have told us they are willing to pay for these features," he said.

Intel will support its channel partners -- both system builders and resellers of branded products -- with Ultrabook enablement efforts.

"We will be delivering it into the channel in North America with both branded and ID share programs," Skaugenz said, with the latter referring to programs to assist system builders by reducing costs by partnering with Asian ODMs, something that Intel began on regular notebooks and which it is now using on Ultrabooks.

"ID share programs let them share the cost of tooling while not competing against themselves in their home market," said Steve Dallman, Intel's venerable VP/GM of its Worldwide Reseller Channel. "They can deal with ODMs in the Pacific Rim. "We have an enormous number of friendly ODMs that are willing to deliver those building blocks."

Skaugenz said five ID share form factors are already available, and they anticipate having 10 designed in the marketplace by the end of 2012.

Skaugenz said they are also investing in training to take branded Ultrabook systems into the marketplace.

"We are making sure with training materials that they know fully what the Ultrabook value proposition is," he said.

Finally, Intel will drive Ultrabook demand with a massive campaign beginning in April targeted at end users.

"This campaign is bigger than anything that Intel has done in a decade," since the Centrino campaign in 2003, Bruno said. "It will explain to end customers why they want to have this as their personal device of choice."

Bruno said they are very excited about the campaign.

"Great marketing comes from great products, and these are pretty innovative and pretty compelling," he said. The campaign will have very heavy online and social networking aspects as well as more traditional broad reach channels.

 

Tagcloud: Intel , laptop  technology , Ultrabooks , business notebook , laptop battery , toshiba pa3534u-1bas battery , hp pavilion dv6 battery

By batteryshops.over-blog.com
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Thursday 15 march 2012 4 15 /03 /Mar /2012 07:30

Tagcloud: Dell XPS 13 , Best Ultrabooks , laptop technology , laptop batteries , battery life , toshiba pa3534u-1brs battery, acer aspire one zg5 battery

 

Dell has a lot of faith in the XPS 13, its first entry into the emerging Ultrabook class of superthin laptops. Compared to what we're used to seeing from Dell, it's a design marvel: thin, light, sleek, and well built with high-quality materials. It looks good, feels good, and performs well. If not for its disappointing display quality and a few minor trackpad issues, the XPS 13 would qualify as the best Ultrabook yet. Even with those drawbacks, it's one of the best Ultraportables around, but I can't recommend it unreservedly.

The version of the dell XPS 13 that I tested is the entry-level model. For $999, you get a Core i5-2467M with Intel integrated graphics, 4GB of RAM, and a 128GB solid-state drive. For $300 more, you can upgrade to a 256GB SSD; and another $200 will boost the CPU to a dual-core Core i7. Our baseline configuration proved to be pretty zippy on its own, delivering a strong WorldBench 7 score of 136 (see "How We Test PCs"). Chalk that performance up to the SSD, which helps the system boot up in about 17 seconds and performs basic file operations very speedily. In our battery tests, the system lasted just a hair under 6.5 hours. However, that number drops precipitously if you crank up the screen brightness, which can get quite bright.

The design and build quality are a cut above anything we've seen from Dell in a long time, and among the best we've seen in any thin-and-light laptop on the market. The base, composed of carbon fiber, has a pleasant soft-touch feel, and it hides the obnoxious service tag info under a flip-up metal plate for a cleaner look. The matte-black magnesium-alloy keyboard deck and the aluminum lid add rigidity where it's needed. The whole machine weighs 3 pounds--nearly the same as Apple's 13-inch Macbook Air. Dell's system, despite having a 13.3-inch screen, is actually shorter and narrower than Apple's, thanks to the extremely narrow bezel around the edge. Dell likes to say that it put a 13-inch screen into an 11-inch chassis, which is a bit of a stretch, but the laptop's compactness is impressive. The XPS 13 felt solid and dense in my hands, and it didn't flex at all.

If you're into games, you had best look elsewhere. Lacking a discrete graphics chip, the XPS 13 delivered unsatisfactory performance in modern 3D games. To achieve playable framer rates in games at the display's native resolution of 1366 by 768, you have to dial the details down to their lowest setting. Even then, with some strenuous games, you can't get a good experience. Thus far, ultrabooks simply aren't for gamers.

I was quite impressed by the keyboard. Most ultrathin laptops' keyboards don't support fast, accurate typing, but the one on the XPS 13 permitted me to click away at full speed. It's even backlit. The trackpad was another story. With the initial release driver, it seemed quite finicky. Set the sensitivity so that the cursor responds well, and it will jump around the screen as you type, due to poor palm detection. Lower the sensitivity to remove that problem, and the cursor stops responding to your touch. I got my hands on a new driver and calibration program (which Dell says will be on its site soon), which greatly improved the situation. The trackpad still isn't among the best I've used, but it's no longer a major weakness.

The display, on the other hand, remains a serious shortcoming. How Dell could make such a solid, attractive, well-performing laptop and then hamstring it with a crummy display is beyond me. The resolution is a bit on the low side--we're used to seeing 1440 by 900 or 1600 by 900 on premium 13-inch laptops. Though 1366 by 768 isn't uncommon, it's not the luxurious high-end spec that Dell ought to have aimed for on a laptop like this one. The average resolution is acceptable, but the visual quality is harder to tolerate. When I moved off-axis to the left or right, colors shifted dramatically. When I opened the lid to the wrong angle, the contrast and brightness went haywire. When I looked closely at certain gradients, I could see the spaces in the grid of pixels. Ultimately this is a mediocre LCD panel covered with pretty edge-to-edge glass. It's not a dealbreaker, just a disappointment.

The audio deserves special mention, if only because it may be the best sound I've heard from a 3-pound Ultrabook. It gets quite loud, and sounds fairly good, considering the design constraints on speaker size and placement. You'll never get big bass or room-filling music from a laptop this small, but the loudness and clarity of the XPS 13's speakers belies the tiny package they come in.

From a design perspective, the XPS 13 is a fantastic addition to Dell's lineup, establishing a new bar that Dell should aim to clear with its future products. The laptop is attractive, solid, and fast. Battery life is good if you don't go crazy with the screen brightness. Audio is better than you'd expect, and the keyboard and trackpad (after the driver update) don't disappoint. With better display quality, it would be a slam-dunk. Unfortunately, the middling resolution, iffy color reproduction, and poor off-axis viewing leave a considerable stain on what would otherwise be a five-star product. Let's hope that Dell releases a revised version this summer that carries Intel's Ivy Bridge chips and a better display.

By batteryshops.over-blog.com
Enter comment - View the 1 comments
Tuesday 13 march 2012 2 13 /03 /Mar /2012 04:52

I think the idea of the "post-PC era" needs some clarification. There is much hoopla and fanfare being dedicated to dwindling PC sales, and the idea that tablets--specifically the Apple's new iPad--are going to be the death knell for PCs. It's not a "death", it's an "evolution" and the tablet is just the new PC.

What is a "PC"? It simply stands for "personal computer". I have had debates in the past with people telling me that PCWorld shouldn't write about Macs. But, a Mac is a "personal computer", and our name is not "Windows PCWorld" (it's funny that nobody ever seems to make that distinction when we write about Linux).

But, I digress. Back to tablets. The advent of tablets may be a harbinger of doom for traditional operating systems like Windows and Mac OS X, but not for PCs. The tablet is a PC itself--it is a device or platform a person uses for computing.

When mini-towers came along, nobody ran around claiming that the sky was falling and that the PC as we know it is dead. When laptops became notebooks, then netbooks, then ultrabooks there was no panic about the end of the PC. They're all just variations on a theme--different sizes and shapes of personal computers. The same is true for tablets.

Will the iPad impact traditional PC sales? Probably. It should. For the vast majority of both business and consumer PC users, the iPad (or tablets in general) provide all of the core functions, such as email, Web surfing, basic productivity, casual gaming, social networking, etc.. And, they have the added benefit of being slim, light, and having battery endurance that can make it through the entire day...and then some.

Ultrabooks offer a close comparison in terms of features and benefits while still fitting the mold of the traditional PC. The MacBook Air is a huge success, and it seems like there is significant demand for the coming onslaught of Windows-based ultrabooks.

There will certainly still be pros and cons to both, but the primary difference at some point will be price. If an ultrabook is $1000, but an iPad 2 is $400, the iPad 2 represents a better value for those who only need the capabilities a tablet can deliver. It makes sense to go with the new PC form factor--the tablet.

If you want more evidence that tablets are the next evolution of PCs rather than a conquering hoard intent on crushing the PC market, just look at Apple and Microsoft. Both of the major desktop operating systems are being merged and transformed to adapt to the new mobile world--evolving to meet the needs of the latest PC form factor.

As the mobile and desktop operating systems for both Apple and Microsoft seem to converge and meld into one, the line gets blurry on the differences between the two in terms of experience, and it just comes down to picking the size and shape of PC that works best for you whether that is a desktop, ultrabook, or tablet.

 

Tagcloud: Tablets , PC  , Apple's new ipad , ultrabooks , laptop technology , laptop batteries , battery for Dell vostro 1500 , dell battery inspiron 6400

By batteryshops.over-blog.com
Enter comment - View the 1 comments

Présentation

  • : batteryshops.over-blog.com's name
  • batteryshops.over-blog.com's name
  • : battery Hp Pavilion dv4 Technology
  • : The appeal and luxury of owning a laptop computer is that you don't need for it to be plugged in all the time in order to operate your computer. This makes working and other computer tasks easier, more flexible, and definitely more comfortable. However, laptop batteries are not always known for their long lasting power abilities.
  • Share this blog
  • Back to homepage
  • Contact

Créer un Blog

Recherche

Calendrier

May 2012
M T W T F S S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
<< < > >>
Create your blog for free on over-blog.com - Contact - Terms of Service - Earn Royalties - Report abuse - Most commented articles